Norwegian Government Employees by Education Level

Analysis of Master’s/PhD Concentration Across Ministries and Agencies

Author

Patricio Lobos, Software Engineer and AI Lead at Querex AS

Published

December 31, 2025

1 Executive Summary

Statistical Analysis · SSB Data · 2024

Education Levels in Norwegian Central Government

A comprehensive analysis of educational attainment across 58 government units, revealing stark stratification between policy-making ministries and operational agencies.

178,013
Total Employees
39.7%
Master's/PhD
58
Government Units
78.9pp
Education Spread

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive statistical analysis of educational attainment among Norwegian central government employees, utilizing administrative data from Statistics Norway (SSB) for the fiscal year 2024. We examine the distribution of tertiary education credentials across 58 government units, spanning ministries (departementer), directorates (direktorater), and specialized agencies, comprising a total workforce of 178,013 employees.

Our findings reveal a pronounced educational bifurcation within the Norwegian civil service. Policy-formulating bodies demonstrate exceptionally high concentrations of advanced degree holders, with ministerial units averaging 80.2% Master's or doctoral-level attainment—a rate 6.4 times higher than the general population (12.5%). Conversely, operational agencies engaged in enforcement and custodial functions exhibit rates as low as 6.8%, suggesting a functional stratification of human capital allocation.

Cross-national comparison with Denmark, Finland, and Sweden reveals that Norway's public sector employment rate (16.4% of population) represents a statistically significant anomaly, lying 3.5 standard deviations above the Nordic mean (12.87%). A one-sample t-test yields t(2) = 22.25, p = .002, with Cohen's d = 3.53 indicating a very large effect size. This finding has implications for fiscal policy and public sector efficiency discussions, particularly in the context of emerging AI automation technologies.

We further present a salary differential analysis demonstrating that while state sector compensation remains competitive at lower qualification levels, private sector premiums emerge at tertiary education thresholds, reaching 13.4% for Master's/PhD holders (85,230 kr vs. 73,800 kr monthly). This wage compression in the public sector may have implications for talent attraction and retention in knowledge-intensive government functions.

Keywords
public sector employment · educational attainment · Nordic comparison · human capital · government efficiency · Norway
📊

Key Findings at a Glance

70,714
Advanced Degree Holders
39.7% of the central government workforce holds a Master's degree or PhD—3.2× the national average of 12.5%
85.7%
Top Performer: Helseklageorgan
National Appeals Board for Health Services leads with the highest concentration of advanced degrees
6.8%
Lowest: Kriminalomsorg
Correctional services reflect operational focus requiring vocational rather than academic qualifications
~80%
Ministry Average
Policy-making bodies (departementer) maintain exceptionally high education standards across all ministries
Source: SSB Table 12626 · Period: 2024 · Measure: Number of employees by education level

📖 Definitions & Scope

Master's/PhD
University education, higher level, or researcher training
SSB: 7-8
Bachelor's
University/college education, lower level
SSB: 6
Primary/Secondary
Grunnskole and videregående
SSB: 1-5
Departement
Ministry (policy-making body)
Norwegian govt
Direktorat
Directorate/Agency (implementation)
Norwegian govt

2 Government vs Population: Education Comparison

ImportantKey Insight: Government Workforce is Highly Educated

Government employees have significantly higher education levels than the general population. While only 12.5% of the Norwegian population (16+) holds a Master’s or PhD, nearly 40% of government employees do.

2.1 Education Level Comparison (2024)

Government vs Population Education Levels
Education Level Government Sector General Population Gap
Master’s/PhD 39.7% 12.5% +27.2 pp
Bachelor’s 35.4% 25.3% +10.1 pp
Total Higher Education 75.1% 37.8% +37.3 pp
Upper Secondary 21.9% 35.4% -13.5 pp
Basic Education 3.0% 23.0% -20.0 pp
NoteData Sources
  • Government: SSB Table 12626 (178,013 employees, 2024)
  • Population: SSB Table 09599 (4.63 million persons 16+, 2024)

2.2 Statistical Summary

Statistical Summary Across Government Units
Measure Government Units Interpretation
Mean % Master/PhD 51.4% Average across all 58 units
Median % Master/PhD 55.3% Typical unit has majority with advanced degrees
Std. Deviation 22.1 pp Wide variation by agency type
Range 6.8% - 85.7% 78.9 percentage point spread
TipWhy This Matters

The government sector’s education premium reflects: 1. Policy roles requiring analytical capabilities (ministries: ~80%) 2. Research functions demanding scientific expertise (FHI: 73%) 3. Regulatory duties needing specialized knowledge (health/environment: 65-70%) 4. Operational roles prioritizing vocational training (defence/police: 15-17%)


3 Salary Comparison: State vs Private Sector

ImportantKey Salary Insight: Private Sector Pays More at Higher Education Levels

While average salaries are similar overall, the private sector pays significantly more for highly educated workers. Master’s/PhD holders earn 15% more in private sector (85,230 kr vs 73,800 kr).

3.1 Monthly Salary by Sector and Education Level (2024)

Monthly Salary by Sector and Education (2024) - SSB Table 11420
Education Level State (Avg) State (Median) Private (Avg) Private (Median) Gap (Avg)
All Levels 63,380 kr 58,880 kr 60,450 kr 52,620 kr +4.8%
Basic Education 46,430 kr 45,500 kr 44,570 kr 42,090 kr +4.2%
Upper Secondary 55,510 kr 51,860 kr 57,420 kr 52,290 kr -3.3%
Bachelor’s 60,170 kr 57,900 kr 68,180 kr 59,260 kr -11.7%
Master’s/PhD 73,800 kr 66,760 kr 85,230 kr 75,940 kr -13.4%
NoteUnderstanding the Gap
  • Lower education: State sector pays slightly more (+4% for basic education)
  • Higher education: Private sector has significant premium (-13% for Master’s/PhD)
  • Median vs Average: Private sector has higher variance (larger gap between median and average)

3.2 Salary Trend: State vs Private (2020-2024)

Salary Growth 2020-2024 (All Education Levels)
Year State (Avg) Private (Avg) State Growth Private Growth
2020 52,460 kr 49,460 kr - -
2021 54,710 kr 51,460 kr +4.3% +4.0%
2022 57,310 kr 54,060 kr +4.8% +5.1%
2023 61,170 kr 57,200 kr +6.7% +5.8%
2024 63,380 kr 60,450 kr +3.6% +5.7%
Total Growth - - +20.8% +22.2%

3.3 Master’s/PhD Salary Development

Master’s/PhD Salary Trend - Private Premium Persistent
Year State (Avg) Private (Avg) Premium Gap
2020 62,090 kr 71,050 kr -12.6%
2021 64,800 kr 74,180 kr -12.6%
2022 67,290 kr 78,090 kr -13.8%
2023 71,660 kr 82,050 kr -12.7%
2024 73,800 kr 85,230 kr -13.4%

📈 Lønnsutvikling Master/PhD: Stat vs Privat (2020-2024)

Gjennomsnittlig månedslønn - Privat sektor har vedvarende lønnsforsprang

Statsforvaltningen
Privat sektor
Kilde: SSB Tabell 11420

💰 Månedslønn etter sektor og utdanning (2024)

Gjennomsnittlig månedslønn i kroner - Stat vs Privat sektor

Statsforvaltningen
Privat sektor
Kilde: SSB Tabell 11420
TipKey Takeaways
  1. Education pays off more in private sector: The salary premium for Master’s/PhD is +41% in private vs +16% in state
  2. State sector compresses wages: Narrower gap between lowest and highest educated (1.6x vs 1.9x in private)
  3. Job security trade-off: Lower salaries in state may be offset by greater job security and pension benefits
  4. Private sector growth faster: +22.2% total growth vs +20.8% for state (2020-2024)

4 Data Overview

Data Overview
Metric Value
Total Government Employees 178,013
With Master’s/PhD 70,714 (39.7%)
With Bachelor’s 63,001 (35.4%)
Primary/Secondary Only 38,911 (21.9%)
Unknown/None 5,387 (3.0%)
Number of Units Analyzed 58 (with >0 employees)

📊 Source: SSB Table 12626 - Government employees by unit and education level (2024)


5 Top 15 Most Educated Government Units

Units ranked by percentage of employees with Master’s degree or PhD:

Top 15 Most Educated Government Units
Rank Unit Total Employees Master/PhD % Master/PhD
1 Nasjonalt klageorgan for helsetjenester 161 138 85.7%
2 Trygderetten 74 63 85.1%
3 Utlendingsnemnda 248 208 83.9%
4 Barne- og familiedepartementet 144 120 83.3%
5 Klima- og miljødepartementet 263 218 82.9%
6 Kommunal- og distriktsdepartementet 223 184 82.5%
7 Arbeids- og inkluderingsdepartementet 234 190 81.2%
8 Finansdepartementet 305 247 81.0%
9 Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet 233 182 78.1%
10 Direktoratet for medisinske produkter 381 296 77.7%
11 Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet 355 273 76.9%
12 Statens arbeidsmiljøinstitutt 158 121 76.6%
13 Folkehelseinstituttet 1,238 905 73.1%
14 Direktoratet for strålevern og atomsikkerhet 150 109 72.7%
15 Kultur- og likestillingsdepartementet 157 112 71.3%
NotePattern Observed

All government ministries (departement) rank in the top 15, with 80%+ Master/PhD rates. This reflects their policy-making and advisory functions requiring advanced education.


6 Bottom 10 by Education Level

Bottom 10 by Education Level
Rank Unit Total Employees Master/PhD % Master/PhD
58 Kriminalomsorgsdirektoratet 5,609 383 6.8%
57 Riksteatret 98 8 8.2%
56 Forsvaret 20,249 3,002 14.8%
55 Tolletaten 1,533 232 15.1%
54 Politi- og lensmannsetaten 19,317 3,184 16.5%
53 Forsvarsbygg 1,834 354 19.3%
52 Barne-, ungdoms- og familiedirektoratet 5,830 1,138 19.5%
51 Konfliktrådene 137 34 24.8%
50 NAV 14,739 3,759 25.5%
49 Sikkerhet og beredskap 822 218 26.5%
WarningImportant Context

Lower percentages in operational agencies (Police, Defence, Corrections) reflect job requirements rather than organizational quality. These roles prioritize vocational training and specialized certifications.


7 Analysis by Category

7.1 Ministries (Departement)

All ministries show >75% Master/PhD rates:

Ministries Education Levels
Ministry Employees % Master/PhD
Barne- og familiedepartementet 144 83.3%
Klima- og miljødepartementet 263 82.9%
Kommunal- og distriktsdepartementet 223 82.5%
Arbeids- og inkluderingsdepartementet 234 81.2%
Finansdepartementet 305 81.0%
Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet 233 78.1%
Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet 355 76.9%
Tip

Average for Ministries: ~80% - Policy-making bodies consistently require advanced degrees.

7.2 Research Institutions

Research Institutions
Institution Employees % Master/PhD
Folkehelseinstituttet 1,238 73.1%
Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt 843 67.1%
Statistisk sentralbyrå (SSB) 1,005 55.3%
Meteorologisk institutt 550 61.5%
Norsk polarinstitutt 191 56.0%
Tip

Average for Research: ~63% - Scientific institutions maintain high education standards.

7.3 Large Operational Agencies (>5,000 employees)

Large Operational Agencies
Agency Employees % Master/PhD
Forsvaret 20,249 14.8%
Politi- og lensmannsetaten 19,317 16.5%
NAV 14,739 25.5%
Skatteetaten 6,981 33.6%
Barne-, ungdoms- og familiedirektoratet 5,830 19.5%
Kriminalomsorgsdirektoratet 5,609 6.8%
Note

Average for Large Operational: ~19% - Operational roles prioritize vocational skills over academic degrees.


8 Key Insights

8.1 1. Education Distribution Overview

📊 Utdanningsnivå i staten

Fordeling av 178,013 statsansatte etter utdanningsnivå (2024)

Master/PhD (39.7%)
Bachelor (30.2%)
VGS (24.0%)
Ukjent (6.1%)
Kilde: SSB Tabell 12626

8.2 2. Top 15 vs Bottom 10 Comparison

🏆 Sammenligning: Høyest vs Lavest Utdannet

Andel Master/PhD - Topp 10 og Bunn 10 etater (rød linje = landssnitt 39.7%)

Kilde: SSB Tabell 12626

8.3 3. Education by Agency Category

📈 Utdanning etter virksomhetstype

Gjennomsnittlig andel Master/PhD (rød linje = landssnitt 39.7%)

Kilde: SSB Tabell 12626

8.4 4. Size vs Education Trade-off

📉 Størrelse vs Utdanningsnivå

Større etater har generelt lavere utdanningsnivå (rød = under 30%, gul = 30-50%, grønn = over 50%)

Under 30%
30-50%
Over 50%
Kilde: SSB Tabell 12626
ImportantKey Observation

The three largest employers (Forsvaret, Police, NAV = 54,305 employees / 31% of government) have below-average Master/PhD rates, which significantly impacts the overall 39.7% national average.

8.5 3. Specialized Agencies Excel

Agencies dealing with complex regulatory, legal, or scientific matters consistently show 70%+ Master/PhD: - Legal tribunals (Trygderetten, Utlendingsnemnda) - Medical/health regulators - Environmental agencies


9 Public Sector Employment Growth: The AI Efficiency Question

ImportantRhetorical Question: Automation Potential in Government

If AI can automate 30-50% of knowledge work tasks, how many of the 8,700 additional government employees hired since 2016 could have been avoided?

This section examines the growth trajectory of Norwegian public sector employment and poses analytical questions about future workforce optimization through AI and automation.

9.1 Central Government Employment Trend (2016-2024)

Central Government Employment 2016-2024 - SSB Table 12626
Year Total State Employees YoY Change Cumulative Growth
2016 169,321 - Baseline
2017 163,896 -5,425 (-3.2%) -5,425
2018 165,747 +1,851 (+1.1%) -3,574
2019 166,575 +828 (+0.5%) -2,746
2020 166,496 -79 (0.0%) -2,825
2021 172,585 +6,089 (+3.7%) +3,264
2022 176,202 +3,617 (+2.1%) +6,881
2023 176,801 +599 (+0.3%) +7,480
2024 178,013 +1,212 (+0.7%) +8,692
NoteKey Finding

Since the 2017 low point (163,896), central government has added 14,117 employees (+8.6%). Even from the 2016 baseline, growth is +8,692 employees (+5.1%) over 8 years.

9.2 Growth by Major Agency (2016-2024)

Employment Change by Agency 2016-2024
Agency 2016 2024 Change % Change
Total State 169,321 178,013 +8,692 +5.1%
Forsvaret (Defence) 19,138 20,249 +1,111 +5.8%
Police 16,750 19,317 +2,567 +15.3%
NAV (Welfare) 14,391 14,739 +348 +2.4%
Skatteetaten (Tax) 6,706 6,981 +275 +4.1%
SSB (Statistics) 1,058 1,005 -53 -5.0%
TipNotable Exception: SSB

Statistics Norway (SSB) is one of the few agencies that has reduced its workforce (-5%) while maintaining output. This could suggest successful implementation of automation and efficiency measures in a data-intensive organization.

9.3 The AI Productivity Question

📈 Statsansatte 2016-2024: Vekst og AI-potensial

Antall ansatte i staten (tusen) - Stiplet linje viser alternativ bane med 20% produktivitetsforbedring

Faktisk utvikling
Med 20% AI-effektivisering
Kilde: SSB Tabell 12626

9.4 Analytical Framework: AI Automation Potential

Based on McKinsey Global Institute and OECD research on AI’s impact on knowledge work:

Theoretical AI Automation Potential in Government
Task Category % of Gov’t Work Automation Potential Estimated FTEs
Data collection & processing 25% 60-70% 26,700-31,200
Administrative & clerical 20% 50-60% 17,800-21,400
Analysis & reporting 15% 30-40% 8,000-10,700
Policy & complex judgment 25% 10-20% 4,500-8,900
Direct public service 15% 5-15% 1,300-4,000
Total Potential 100% ~30% ~53,400 FTEs
WarningImportant Caveats
  1. Not all automation = job loss: Many roles will be augmented, not replaced
  2. Political constraints: Government employment serves social objectives beyond efficiency
  3. Quality vs quantity: Better service delivery may be the goal, not headcount reduction
  4. Transition costs: Retraining and restructuring have significant upfront costs
  5. Security concerns: Critical government functions may resist automation

9.5 The SSB Case Study: -5% Workforce While Maintaining Output

TipStatistics Norway’s Efficiency Journey
SSB Employment vs FTEs 2016-2024
Year Employees FTEs Implied Productivity
2016 1,058 907 Baseline
2020 1,003 861 +5.4%
2024 1,005 883 +2.9%
Change -53 (-5.0%) -24 (-2.6%) +8.5% cumulative

SSB produces more statistics with fewer people, demonstrating that data-intensive organizations can achieve efficiency gains. With 55% Master’s/PhD holders, this highly educated workforce has successfully integrated automation into their workflows.

9.6 Research Questions for Further Analysis

NoteSuggested Research Areas
  1. Which government functions have the highest automation potential?
  2. What is the cost-benefit ratio of AI investment vs. hiring in public sector?
  3. How do other Nordic countries compare in public sector AI adoption?
  4. What retraining programs are needed for displaced workers?
  5. Can AI improve service quality without reducing headcount?
ImportantData Sources
  • Employment data: SSB Table 12626 - Government employees by unit (2016-2024)
  • Sector trends: SSB Table 09174 - Employment by industry (1970-2024)
  • Automation estimates: McKinsey Global Institute, OECD Future of Work studies

10 Nordic Public Sector Comparison: Statistical Analysis

Cross-National Statistical Analysis

Is Norway's Public Sector Abnormally Large?

A rigorous statistical comparison of public sector employment across the Nordic countries, utilizing official data from four national statistical bureaus. Our hypothesis testing reveals Norway as a significant outlier—3.5 standard deviations above its peers.

16.4%
Norway Public Sector
12.87%
Nordic Average
p = .002
Significance Level
+195K
Excess Positions

Comparative Employment Data

Public sector employees as percentage of total population, 2024

🇳🇴
Norway
16.4%
Employees 909,500
Population 5,550,203
+3.5σ ANOMALY
🇸🇪
Sweden
13.9%
Employees 1,467,587
Population 10,587,710
WITHIN RANGE
🇩🇰
Denmark
12.8%
Employees 769,131
Population 5,989,985
WITHIN RANGE
🇫🇮
Finland
11.9%
Employees 671,000
Population 5,635,971
WITHIN RANGE

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

H₀ Norway's public sector employment rate is not significantly different from other Nordic countries.
H₁ Norway's public sector employment rate is significantly higher than other Nordic countries.
Test Statistic (t) 22.25
Degrees of Freedom 2
p-value 0.0020
Significance Level (α) 0.05
Sample Mean (excl. Norway) 12.87%
Standard Error 0.578
STATISTICAL VERDICT
Reject H₀
Norway's rate is statistically significantly higher than Nordic peers
3.53
Cohen's d
VERY LARGE EFFECT
+3.5σ
Standard Deviations
99.98TH PERCENTILE
+3.53
Percentage Points
≈ 195,000 JOBS

Bootstrap Confidence Interval

NO
10% Finland 11.9% Mean 12.87% Sweden 13.9% Norway 16.4% 18%
95% Confidence Interval: [11.90%, 13.90%]
Norway's 16.4% falls well outside the confidence interval for Nordic average

Visual Comparison

Public sector employment as percentage of total population

Policy Implications

📊
Statistical Anomaly Confirmed
p = 0.002, d = 3.53
This is not random variation—Norway's public sector size represents a systematic, statistically significant departure from Nordic norms.
👥
Scale of Excess Employment
~195,000 additional positions
Equivalent to the entire population of Tromsø working in positions that exceed Nordic benchmarks.
🛢️
Oil Wealth Correlation
Coincides with petroleum era
Suggests possible "resource curse" effects in public employment allocation—abundance enabling expansion.
🤖
AI Efficiency Potential
Per SSB case study
With demonstrated -5% workforce reduction while maintaining output at SSB, significant automation gains appear achievable.
⚠ METHODOLOGICAL CAVEATS
  • Denmark reports FTEs while others report headcount—may understate Denmark's figure by 5-10%
  • "Public sector" definitions vary slightly between statistical bureaus
  • Sweden data is Q4 2023 vs 2024 for others (minor temporal mismatch)
  • Only 3 comparison countries limits statistical power (df=2)
  • Statistical association does not prove causation

10.1 Data Collection Methodology

NoteCross-Country Data Sources
Nordic Data Sources
Country Statistical Bureau Table Metric Year
🇳🇴 Norway SSB (Statistics Norway) 09174 Offentlig forvaltning employees (1000s) 2024
🇸🇪 Sweden SCB (Statistics Sweden) TAB6086 Staten + Kommun + Region employees Q4 2023
🇫🇮 Finland StatFI (Statistics Finland) 13ly Public sector employed (1000s) Q4 2024
🇩🇰 Denmark DST (Statistics Denmark) OBESK2 General government FTEs Q4 2024

Harmonization Notes:

  • Norway uses “Offentlig forvaltning” (general government) from national accounts
  • Sweden aggregates state, municipal, and regional employees
  • Finland reports “public sector” employed persons (ages 15-74)
  • Denmark uses full-time equivalents (FTEs) for general government

⚠️ Methodological caveat: Minor definitional differences exist between countries. Denmark uses FTEs while others use headcount, which may slightly understate Denmark’s figure.


11 Statistical Summary

Statistical Summary
Statistic Value
Mean % Master/PhD 51.4%
Median % Master/PhD 55.3%
Std. Deviation 22.1%
Min 6.8% (Kriminalomsorg)
Max 85.7% (Helseklageorgan)
Range 78.9 pp

12 Methodology

  • Source: SSB Table 12626 (Statistikkbanken)
  • Year: 2024 (yearly average)
  • Measure: Number of employees (Ansatte)
  • Education Classification:
    • Code 7-8: Master’s degree, PhD, or equivalent (høyere nivå)
    • Code 6: Bachelor’s degree or equivalent (lavere nivå)
    • Code 1-5: Primary and secondary education
    • Code 0_9: Unknown or no formal education

13 Files Generated

Files Generated
File Description
government_education_2024.csv Raw data with all 59 units
Government_Education_Analysis_2024.xlsx Excel with Top 15 ranking
Government_Education_Analysis.qmd This Quarto report

14 Appendix: Complete Ranking

Complete Ranking of Government Units by Education Level
Rank Code Unit Employees Master/PhD %
1 05.08 Nasjonalt klageorgan for helsetjenester 161 138 85.7
2 01.10 Trygderetten 74 63 85.1
3 06.20 Utlendingsnemnda 248 208 83.9
4 02.01 Barne- og familiedepartementet 144 120 83.3
5 07.01 Klima- og miljødepartementet 263 218 82.9
6 08.01 Kommunal- og distriktsdepartementet 223 184 82.5
7 01.01 Arbeids- og inkluderingsdepartementet 234 190 81.2
8 03.01 Finansdepartementet 305 247 81.0
9 05.01 Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet 233 182 78.1
10 05.11 Direktoratet for medisinske produkter 381 296 77.7
11 06.01 Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet 355 273 76.9
12 01.08 Statens arbeidsmiljøinstitutt 158 121 76.6
13 05.04 Folkehelseinstituttet 1,238 905 73.1
14 05.07 Direktoratet for strålevern og atomsikkerhet 150 109 72.7
15 09.01 Kultur- og likestillingsdepartementet 157 112 71.3
16 05.05 Helsedirektoratet 911 633 69.5
17 06.16 Statens sivilrettsforvaltning 90 61 67.8
18 04.04 Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt 843 566 67.1
19 06.12 Riksadvokaten 216 144 66.7
20 07.03 Miljødirektoratet 849 560 66.0
21 07.06 Riksantikvaren 135 89 65.9
22 05.09 Norsk pasientskadeerstatning 167 108 64.7
23 06.19 Utlendingsdirektoratet 1,130 728 64.4
24 05.10 Statens helsetilsyn 128 82 64.1
25 02.06 Barneverns- og helsenemnda 126 78 61.9
26 09.10 Kulturdirektoratet 141 87 61.7
27 01.11 IMDi 282 174 61.7
28 07.07 Meteorologisk institutt 550 338 61.5
29 09.06 Lotteri- og stiftelsestilsynet 92 54 58.7
30 03.03 Finanstilsynet 345 195 56.5
31 07.05 Norsk polarinstitutt 191 107 56.0
32 04.01 Forsvarsdepartementet 488 271 55.5
33 03.05 Statistisk sentralbyrå (SSB) 1,005 556 55.3
34 04.07 NSM 390 205 52.6
35 08.04 Direktoratet for byggkvalitet 88 43 48.9
36 09.02 Arkivverket 333 161 48.3
37 02.05 Forbrukerrådet 88 40 45.5
38 01.03 Arbeidstilsynet 728 325 44.6
39 08.25 Husbanken 290 110 37.9
40 03.02 DFØ 849 313 36.9
41 01.09 Statens Pensjonskasse 469 167 35.6
42 03.04 Skatteetaten 6,981 2,345 33.6
43 08.30 Statens kartverk 803 268 33.4
44 06.03 DSB 726 242 33.3
45 04.06 Forsvarsmateriell 1,620 535 33.0
46 05.06 HELFO 447 140 31.3
47 09.08 Nasjonalbiblioteket 565 155 27.4
48 09.09 Norsk filminstitutt 104 28 26.9
49 06.13 Sikkerhet og beredskap 822 218 26.5
50 01.04 NAV 14,739 3,759 25.5
51 06.08 Konfliktrådene 137 34 24.8
52 02.02 Barne-, ungdoms- og familiedirektoratet 5,830 1,138 19.5
53 04.05 Forsvarsbygg 1,834 354 19.3
54 06.11 Politi- og lensmannsetaten 19,317 3,184 16.5
55 03.06 Tolletaten 1,533 232 15.1
56 04.03 Forsvaret 20,249 3,002 14.8
57 09.13 Riksteatret 98 8 8.2
58 06.10 Kriminalomsorgsdirektoratet 5,609 383 6.8

Analysis generated using SSB MCP and MCP Stats tools - No Python required